About the blog

A Google search on “negative near-death experience” will bring up–at least as this is written–6,480,000 links. Is another site really necessary? You can believe it is! Make this 6,480,001.

The thing is, somewhere in that mass of entries there will  be some well-grounded information; but you’re on your own to find it. Overwhelmingly, post after post after post, what you will find is personal opinion based on rumor or doctrinal religious views or conventional wisdom or guesswork, some of it like trampolines launching folks into sheer nonsense. This site will give you as much reliable data as I know of and as much thoughtful commentary as I am capable of or can find. It will include a variety of religious perspectives. When the data isn’t altogether factual, I will say so. Opinion will be noted as such.

Let me say quickly that although this site is neither anti-religious or non-religious, neither does it wave any doctrinal flag. It’s just that I want to create the fullest possible understanding of what is going on with these deeply troubling spiritual experiences. That means that what you find here will consider many secular elements other than and along with religious statements before drawing any conclusions.

I am a near-death experiencer. On Sundays, I am in church, where I exercise a deep faith and a thoroughgoing distrust of literal interpretations, though I accept that others find them meaningful. I have also been for thirty years a researcher of distressing near-death experiences, working with the International Association for Near-Death Studies and publishing in their peer-reviewed, scholarly journal. My work bridges the gulfs between social science research, religious beliefs, secularism, and the sometimes loony world of public opinion, with occasional brushes with findings from the neurosciences. To the best of my knowledge, it is as close as anyone has come to publishing substantial scholarship specifically about the distressing end of the near-death spectrum. Exceptions: Theosophical scholar Gracia Fay Ellwood set a high standard for scholarship with The Uttermost Deep; however, the book’s objective was not to describe and investigate distressing NDEs themselves, but to consider their impact on the idea of survival after death. P.M.H. Atwater has for many years written thoughtfully about distressing NDEs. Her conclusions are based on her investigative findings and on her own considerable intuitive abilities and views rather than incorporating cross-referenced perspectives from other researchers, making it a non-academic type of research.)

I trust that this site and the book Dancing in the Dark, which will soon be available online, will be the source of the kind of solid, trustworthy information that was not available after my own distressing NDE. I hope you will keep coming back to see what new posts, articles, and links have been added. If you have recommendations, please let me know (except, please, no conventional religious claims or quotes from scripture, as those are already in abundant supply online).

You are very welcome here.

Nancy Evans Bush

12 thoughts on “About the blog”

  1. Hi Nancy! Warm, heartfelt congratulations on your blog and on your forthcoming book!! Well done!

    I am looking forward to chapter 2: you left us hanging with the other shoe yet to drop. And, more importantly, I am hoping that your book provides an in-depth study of the distressing NDE — it’s something that’s really needed in this field.

    Warm wishes for success with your book and your blog — I look forward to reading both!
    Robert

  2. Nancy, I can’t wait for the book to be published! I know that for many years you have been a “voice crying in the wilderness” regarding negative near-death experiences. When I was writing my book, VISIONS OF GOD FROM THE NEAR DEATH EXPERIENCE, I thought long and hard about what to do with hellish experiences. Two of my 75 cases had negative experiences and were not rescued immediately. Then your article in PSYCHIATRY journal was published with 50 cases of negative experiences which you divided into 3 categories. Your article was a God-send! I not only realized that my 2 cases were not “outliers,” and that in fact, I had more because I hadn’t considered the cases that began negative but later turned positive. In other words, I had been a “victim” of the popular press.

    You’ve also done a great job of keeping this topic from being ignored by NDE researchers. Your presentation with a massive amount of DATA at the 30th Annual IANDS Conference in Houston and subsequent book chapter in Holden, Greyson, and James’ book THE HANDBOOK OF NEAR-DEATH EXPERIENCES are brilliant!

  3. I look forward to the completed tome, Nancy! Bravo for your amazing passion in this field of study! Please notify us when you’ve published. Blessings, Alan

  4. Hello, Nancy,

    I’d like to subscribe to your blog. Can you sign me in?

    Thank you,
    Suzanne Mays

  5. Hi Nancy,

    Congratulations on your blog. It is much needed and a very valuable resource. It is great that you take the frightening NDEs so seriously as so many researchers pay such little attention to them.

    They certainly occur – I had two frightening NDErs in my prospective hospital study. One lady was so terrified that I had to terminate the interview because she became so upset. We really do need to learn more on these NDEs.

    I often get contacted by people who have had a frightening NDE so I can now direct them to your blog for further information.

    I can’t wait to read your forthcoming book. Good luck with it.

    Penny

  6. Get your book out, please.
    And thank you for this amazing blog. The world of the distressing NDE is wrapped in mystery, yet I do not see this as a way to figure it all out. Rather, you’ve provided a safe platform for compassionate confirmation: these experiences do indeed exist, and our human family is all the better for the exploration.
    BY the way, did I mention: get the book out? on Kindle? ASAP ?

    with admiration and a smile,
    Rev. Elke

  7. Sandy Renner said:

    Dear Nancy,

    I notice in “About the Blog”, that you say you have a deep faith, and that you distrust literal interpretations. I am a person of faith, who long ago left the Fundamentalist understanding of my childhood. I only recently encountered the research on negative NDEs, and it is deeply troubling to me, although I’ve never had one. I’m curious, How do you make sense of these experiences? In one of your articles, you write about “finding the gift in the dark”. What was that gift for you? I’m trying to hold on to my deepest experience/intuition that love is at the heart of things. Any insight you could offer would be deeply appreciated.

    Peace,
    Sandy

    • Sandy, your question (which I suspect is just about everyone’s question) is why I’ve written the book! (Due out as an ebook by Easter, I think. Stay tuned…)

      A complete response would take far longer than a blog post, but at its simplest, I think you’re right, that love is at the heart of things. That’s not to jump to any instant alternatives about distressing visionary experiences, but just to say that I believe the darkness is not conclusive and final. It is certainly not the vicious hell of rabid human imagination, with an eternal physical torment meted out by an angry god. (No cap G for that concept!) Look at any Hubble photo, and you’ll see instantly that the entire universe is made up of radiance and deep darkness, peace and violence; why should our personal universes or our experiences be different?

      If you read through the comments, especially for the next-to-last post (“15 things we know about distressing NDEs), you’ll find some intriguing comments that may be helpful. It’s been occurring to me that I need to do some writing about faith and these NDEs, and you seem to have given a push in just that direction. Again, stay tuned. Maybe the next post.

      Thank you so much for your comment. It’s such a powerful issue!

  8. Sandy Renner said:

    Thanks, and I’ll stay tuned!

Leave a comment